Send us your thoughts: viewermail@autolinedetroit.tv
Note: Your name and/or email may be read on the air.

John,

Seems to me that the Big 3 , except for GM with its Aveo, has no plans to take on the imports in the subcompact segment, I see no upcoming small cars in the horizon, just some mention of Chrysler bringing in Chinese cars in a few years. Do you know of any such plans?

Pedro, loyal watcher.
Pedro,

There’s a trio of B-class cars coming soon, including Ford Fiesta, Dodge Hornet and all-new Aveo. If they sell well, more will be on the way.

JMc
Dear John,

The work you have been doing the past few months is superb. This week's story on the Bluetec launch is exactly the reason I watch your show---to find out about the industry. Your stay in California, interview with Chrysler's LaSorda, and AutoNation's Jackson, were riveting for someone like me who is as interested in cars as the industry and people who make them. After '30 Rock' yours is my favorite show, even as I watch you online. And it's nice to see you sometimes jump out of your sports coat and tie.

Sincerely,
Mike W
John,

The Chevy Cruze sure looks like a winner for GM unless they lose it with quality issues. Do you know if it's a new design or just a reworked Cobalt?

Pedro, loyal watcher.
Pedro,

The Cruze is an all-new design!

McElroy
John,

A very interesting show with Mike Jackson; was he joking when he suggested to someone at GM to make Chevy their No. 1 brand. Why would they not listen to major car retailer, but then GM reduced their No. 1 quality factory in the world Oshawa. It seems hard to believe what GM does in the market place; all the younger ones in our office drive Japanese cars.

James Thompson
Twice in one show Mike Jackson said you can “make a LOT of money…” and his facial expression beamed with greed. On both occasions he corrected himself to say “a little money.” Mike, your slip is showing and it wasn’t lost on the audience. With a performance like that, you can expect AutoNation customers to count their fingers after your salesman shakes their hand.

Clinton
John,

I echo the comments by Mr. Derek T. Versteegen. Once again a tremendous show. While I enjoy every episode, and find your guests informative and interesting without exception, Mr. Mike Jackson is clearly in a class by himself. His performance on the show was brutally honest, insightful and witty. As mentioned in a previous post, he reiterates many of the ideas and positions I believe in, whether it comes to domestic energy policy, US marketing strategy or consumer behavior. A super guest.

Tony Gray
York, PA
Thanks for putting a video podcast on iTunes. Love the show, but without a podcast I’d never remember to look for new episodes on the website.

Bert Schmitz
John,

Your last show with Mike Jackson has to be one of the best I have ever seen, this man should be running GM or Ford, he's right on, on just about everything you covered, it's obvious he doesn't have his head up in the penthouse of those gleaming Big 3 corporate buildings. He knows exactly what customers want and need, I will certainly buy my next car from an AutoNation dealer.
Dear John,

There’s been nobody that has beaten the drum for the survival of the American auto industry harder than you. Unfortunately, when our gang (GM-Ford-Chrysler) went to meet with the current administration it was, “sorry guys fend for yourselves”. I've read a lot about this natural-gas (CMG/LNG), both of them will work, and the industry needs to jump on this one. The advocates say that the vehicle has another 400-500 pounds in it, but will get close to the MPG of its gas counterpart, plus burns 90% cleaner. They also say that the fill-up time might only be a minute or two longer than with gasoline. I think almost everyone would put up with that if the price is somewhere around .85 to a $1.00 per equivalent gal.! Just think what this would mean to our beleaguered auto industry; why we could still drive the Suburban! If the fuel industry won't retrofit its stations to carry and supply this commodity then the auto industry should be given tax-credits to build their own infrastructure and forget the reluctant petrol companies. Maybe then, Chrysler could bring out that beautiful American Aston Martin; the Firepower coupe.

Sincerely,

Jim Thykeson,
Venice, FL
John McElroy,

Maybe you can answer or get an answer to this question. Ford has been selling the Fiesta everywhere else in the world but not here. They say they are bringing it out here, but they have been saying that for a few years now. They can bring a totally new vehicle out a lot faster then bringing this over, why? Please read the story on this link.

http://tinyurl.com/6ad93l

This talks about a 65 mpg Fiesta that will be available in Europe. Think about this, Ford says that this car can not sell here. It gets double the fuel economy over any car they sell today; my 95 Escort does just as good as any car they sell today. This Fiesta would also beat any vehicle in the US market today, and they feel it wouldn’t sell? When I send an email to Ford, I just get a form email as a reply.

Thank you,
David Boyle
David,

For whatever reason, Ford never thought it could sell a B-segment car in the U.S. When gasoline hit $4 a gallon, that changed. But now Ford has to build a plant (in Mexico) to make the Fiesta. That takes about two years to put in place. Also, the Fiesta will probably be priced right on top of the current Focus, so the company also has to bring the new Focus to the American market, and price it higher.

As far as the 65 mpg Fiesta goes, that uses a diesel. And if you know anything about U.S. diesel emission standards, it explains why diesels in passenger cars are a non-starter in the American market. In 2010, what is known as EPA Tier II, Bin 5 regulations go into effect. That will add about $4,000 onto the price of a diesel. Remember too that diesel fuel now costs substantially more than gasoline. I think Ford is right that diesels will not sell here.

Maybe VW and Mercedes can eke out some diesel sales, but it’s important to note that in Europe, diesel sales are starting to fall for the very same reasons: costly emission standards and the high price of diesel fuel.

McElroy
Dear Autoline,

I watch your show often and generally find the show very insightful and honest. Having said that, this episode (#1235) has got to be the best one I've seen, ever. I think Mike Jackson is dead on with his analysis, as he's made statements similar to those I've often shared with fellow auto enthusiasts - his perspective is phenomenal. His insight is priceless and his honesty is comforting. Who were those others guys on the show - lol - Mr. Jackson stole the show. Jackson's explanations and examples were clear as day and on point accurate. I'm glad I tuned in (online).

Derek T. Versteegen
John:

I watched episode #1233 and the diesel application discussion with Mr. LaSorda. A car I had in the 80s came to mind.

It was a 1983 Olds Cierra sedan, with v-6 diesel, built as a diesel after the v-8 conversion proved wrong. This vehicle gave me a consistent 30 mpg, had little exhaust smoke and reasonable power in all conditions. The fuel pump required rebuild at about 105,000 miles, but nothing for the engine. Car was used totally in the upper Midwest and traded at 125,000 miles in 1988. This engine is never noted in the press, but does prove GM could build an effective diesel for auto use.

I am confident that a reasonably priced turbo/diesel will evolve from the current turmoil.

Robert H. Jamerson
Phoenix, AZ
Robert,

Thanks for reminding us of the good passenger-car diesel that GM made. One of the guys here at the office had one, too and still raves about the fuel economy it delivered!

McElroy
Hello!!!!!!

I don't know if you heard or not but I recently downsized my car collection from 32 to 15 cars. I increased the quality while I decreased the quantity. The quality of my collection was bumped up by adding a mint condition 1973 FIAT 130 Coupe and a bright yellow 2001 Qvale Mangusta with 5,000 miles on the odometer.

As far as the FIAT is concerned, I say if it's good enough for Sophia Loren and Michael Corleone then its good enough for me.

The Qvale? A gorgeous bright yellow with an even more stunning Cappuccino hand stitched leather interior. It is # 238 and I am told it may be the one displayed up there at the 2001 Detroit Auto Show. I have also been told that it is one of 4 yellow automatic transmission Qvale's in the United States.

John, I am having a real headache with the PAX System Michelin Run Flat tires that came on my 2006 NISSAN Quest. Our family hauler now has 31,000 miles on it and my NISSAN Service Department is going to install a new set for me tomorrow. We didn't get very good mileage on these tires but I'm going to get one more set and keep my eye on the proper rotation schedule much closer than the original set.

In other BIG news, because of the current price of gasoline, I ordered a new car on September 10th.

I'm getting a Summer Yellow 2009 Aveo 5 Hatchback with a 5 speed manual transmission. I'm getting the top of the line 2LT Option Group. I love the new dark charcoal/silver optional perforated "leatherette" interior. I also ordered the sunroof, spoiler, and, of course, the 15 inch alloy wheels.

I love the new "face" of the car, but the CLINCHER was the new for '09 Cadillac Escalade chrome vent details on the front wings.

It looks like "my" Aveo is going to have a MSRP (including destination) of: $17,195.00.

That's $10,000 MORE than the MSRP of my 1974 Corvette!

So, the "bookends" of my car collection will be my black 1959 Peugeot 403 sedan and the "Corvette" Yellow 2009 Aveo 5 (a 50 year spread!). I think I'm going to enjoy the XM Radio feature in the little Daewoo!!!

All my best to you and your family!!!!!!

Sincerely,

Gary N. Goldstein
President
The French Car Club of Atlanta
(ALPINE-Citroen-MATRA-Peugeot-Renault-SIMCA)

P.S I am keeping my black 2003 Land Rover Discovery.
I will drive it 975 miles or so a year.
I plan on driving the Aveo 5 about 4,750 miles per year.
I just found myself doing too many errands in the Quest when I was the only person in the vehicle.
Hi John,

I don't often email T.V. shows, but I just had to say that Myles Kovacs of DUB was one of your best interviews since Buzz Hargrove, way more interesting than all those politically correct CEO's. More interviews with strong, confident and smart leaders like that are what I look forward to. Good work John.

Pat Maclou
Chilliwack, B.C.
Auto Facts VS Perception....very interesting info

Distributing the factual data listed in the memo below to friends (especially those who are not car enthusiasts) will help heighten awareness of the facts and (hopefully) help align public perception with reality.

It is agonizingly clear that the media seldom, if ever, chooses to do so (most notably Consumer Reports, Road & Track, Car & Driver as well as TV and local newspapers).

--------

If you have noticed all the bad news the last 3 years regarding the falling sales of the domestic auto industry, you might be interested in the following questions, possible answers are listed alphabetically.

The correct answers, along with source, are given below.

1. Which country can boast that their brands occupy 2 of the top 3 spots for long-term reliability?

a. Germany
b. Japan
c. Korea
d. United States

2. As of August 2007, which manufacturer had the most recalled vehicles in the U.S. for that year?

a. Chrysler
b. Ford
c. GM
d. Nissan
e. Toyota
f. Volkswagen

3. Pick the brand from each group that has the highest initial quality.

a. Acura, BMW, Cadillac (all luxury makes)
b. Honda, Mercury, Nissan (all non-luxury makes)
c. Acura (lux), Chevrolet (non-lux), BMW (lux), Mazda
(non-lux)

4. Which mid-size sedan has the highest initial quality?

a. Accord (Honda)
b. Altima (Nissan)
c. Camry (Toyota)
d. Malibu (Chevrolet)

5. Which large sedan has the highest initial quality?

a. Avalon (Toyota)
b. Grand Prix (Pontiac)
c. Sable (Mercury)

6. Which mid-size pickup has the highest initial quality?

a. Dakota (Dodge)
b. Ranger (Ford)
c. Tacoma (Toyota)

7. Which car is the most economical overall?

a. Aveo (Chevrolet)
b. Fit (Honda)
c. Prius (Toyota)

8. Which car did the LA Times describe as “a better car than BMW or Mercedes or Lexus or Infiniti”?

a. A6 (Audi)
b. CTS (Cadillac)
c. RL (Acura)

9. Which company makes the winner of the 2008 “Green Car of the Year” award?

a. Chevrolet
b. Honda
c. Toyota

10. Which car was selected by the North American automotive press corps as the “North American Car of the Year” for 2007?

a. Aura (Saturn)
b. Camry (Toyota)
c. Fit (Honda)

11. Which car won the same award for 2008?

a. Accord (Honda)
b. Altima coupe (Nissan)
c. Malibu (Chevrolet)

12. Which company had a luxury vehicle, a mid-size sedan, and a large truck removed from the Consumer Reports recommended vehicles list in October 2007 because of mounting quality problems?

a. Chrysler
b. Ford
c. General Motors
d. Hyundai
e. Toyota
f. Volkswagen
ANSWERS:

1. Which country can boast that their brands occupy 2 of the top 3 spots for long-term reliability?

Answer: United States. Per J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Study, Mercury and Cadillac are in the top 3, along with Lexus. And in 2007, Buick was tied with Lexus for the top spot.

http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2008115

2. As of August 2007, which manufacturer had the most recalled vehicles in the U.S. for that year?

Answer: Volkswagen. According to Business Week, Volkswagen had the most recalls at this time a year ago. The second worst was Toyota.

http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/aug2007/bw20070810_455098.htm

3. Pick the brand from each group that has the highest initial quality.

a. Answer: Cadillac (better than both Acura and BMW)
b. Answer: Mercury (better than both Honda and Nissan)
c. Answer: Chevrolet (better than Acura, BMW, and Mazda)

This is according to J.D. Power’s Initial Quality Survey.

http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2008063

4. Which mid-size sedan has the highest initial quality?

Answer: The Chevrolet Malibu has better initial quality than any competitor, including the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry and Nissan Altima.

The Ford Fusion also beat all 3 Japanese competitors. This too is from the J.D. Power Initial Quality Survey, which also reveals that above average are American brands Mercury, Ford, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Pontiac, Lincoln, and Buick. Below average are import brands Acura, Kia, Nissan, BMW, Mazda, VW, Subaru, and Scion (and several others).

http://www.jdpower.com/autos/articles/2008-Initial-Quality:-Midsize-and-Large-Cars

http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2008063

5. Which large sedan has the highest initial quality?

Answer: Again per J.D. Power, the highest quality large car is the Pontiac Grand Prix, beating the Toyota Avalon. Two other Detroit cars that beat the Avalon are the Mercury Sable and Mercury Grand Marquis.

http://www.jdpower.com/autos/articles/2008-Initial-Quality:-Midsize-and-Large-Cars

6. Which mid-size pickup has the highest initial quality?

Answer: The Dodge Dakota has the best quality for mid-size pickups, proving that Chrysler too can beat the imports. Both the Dakota and the Ford Ranger beat the Toyota Tacoma.

http://www.jdpower.com/autos/articles/2008-Initial-Quality:-Pickups-and-Vans

7. Which car is the most economical overall?

Answer: Per Edmunds.com, the premier automotive analysis site, the most economical car in America, taking into account not only mileage but all costs, is the Chevrolet Aveo. The Honda Fit is #3 and the Toyota Prius is a distant #34.

http://www.edmunds.com/help/about/press/127806/article.html

8. Which car did the Los Angeles Times describe as “a better car than BMW or Mercedes or Lexus or Infiniti”?

Answer: “Cadillac makes a better car than BMW or Mercedes or Lexus or Infiniti, and that car is the 2008 CTS. No other car in the mass market dares so much as this expressive and audacious bit of automotive avant-gardism.” Dan Neil, LA Times.

http://www.latimes.com/classified/automotive/highway1/la-hy-neil12dec12-pg,0,5427133.photogallery

9. Which company makes the winner of the 2008 “Green Car of the Year” award?

Answer: The Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid is the winner of this award. How could a full-size SUV defeat the media darling Toyota Prius? Read the link below and you will discover, “What’s equally eye-opening is that the Tahoe’s 21 mpg city fuel efficiency rating is the same as that of the city EPA rating for the four-cylinder Toyota Camry sedan.”

Did you catch that? A huge, full-size SUV from Chevrolet that gets the same city mileage as a 4-cylinder Toyota Camry!! Chevy obtained this remarkable achievement through the use of its 2-mode hybrid system, a technology that Toyota does not have.

http://www.greencar.com/features/2008greencar/

10. Which car was selected by the North American automotive press corps as the “North American Car of the Year” for 2007?

Answer: Not only was the Saturn Aura picked by the automotive press corps as better than the Honda Fit and the Toyota Camry, “When a panel of 47 journalists named the Saturn Aura the North American Car of the Year over the Toyota Camry, the vote wasn't even close, 205-89.” Chicago Tribune, 1/15/07

http://www.northamericancaroftheyear.org/news.html

11. Which car won the same award for 2008?

Answer: GM again crushed the Japanese competition in 2008 when the Malibu received 190 votes to the Honda Accord’s 95. The Accord actually came in 3rd since GM’s other finalist, the Cadillac CTS, received 165 votes.

http://www.northamericancaroftheyear.org/news.html

12. Which company had a luxury vehicle, a mid-size sedan, and a large truck removed from the Consumer Reports recommended vehicles list in October 2007 because of mounting quality problems?

Answer: Toyota’s much publicized quality problems resulted in Consumer Reports actually removing from their recommended vehicles list the Lexus GS luxury car, Camry V6 sedan, and Tundra pickup. This demotion occurred in October 2007.

This Q&A list was put together by an employee of an American car company who just might lose his job because of public perceptions that do not match reality. If you are one of the many Americans who gave up on Detroit’s cars because of a bad experience many years ago, it’s time to rethink your position. Rethink Detroit.

Detroit automakers: 79 U.S. jobs per 2,500 cars sold in America.
Foreign automakers: 33 U.S. jobs per 2,500 cars sold in America.

http://levelfieldinstitute.org/

http://www.overthehillcarpeople.com/
Private equity is always about generating huge fees for the partners and leaving the rotting corpse for the trash can. What would you like to bet on Chrysler's future? Watched the interview and saw the lineup. These guys are not the future bill millers to lead a passionate resurgence. Their product design and build quality doesn't rise to the level of fleet sales. Point of fact, aren't they looking to sell viper? Guess you could Google Cerberus (I think that's the company name) to get a history but I have to bath the dog.

Sam Baylus
Harrisonburg, VA
RE Episode #1233

This is my first time seeing this program, my brother suggested I watch it. A GREAT show, an amazing host, who will ask tough questions!

Keep up the good work,

Ken Moffatt
Hi John,

There is a lot of talk lately about CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) and how it can affect America’s future. Can you do a story on this? I heard a rumor that engines wear out sooner than normal using CNG but I cannot find any answers on this.

Sincerely,

Alan Andrews
Grants Pass, Oregon
John,

I've been wondering - and perhaps you could do an Automotive Insight on it - why the price at the pump has not dropped more than it has.

Let me explain. First, I understand that the reason fuel stations raise their prices the instant that oil prices go up or instability in the market rises is because they have to try and collect 'today' for the price they will have to pay for their next delivery of higher priced fuel 'tomorrow'. I also realize that Hurricane Ike fears have driven prices up drastically at the pump. Again, in anticipation for the higher price of the 'next' few batches of fuel.

But even withstanding that logic, what doesn't make sense to me is why fuel has failed to dip below or at least to $3.00/gallon. Oil, at it's highest in history, was around $148/barrel just this summer. At which time gas at the pump jumped as high as $4.15 (maybe even higher in some places). Today on my way in to work I heard it had fallen to $97.09/barrel. Before Ike, it was around $102/barrel, yet gas still hovered around $3.65.

Now, if the price per barrel managed to drop by roughly 31% (from $148 to $102), why haven't our fuel prices dropped by as much ($4.15 to $2.86)? I understand that there is much greater demand worldwide now than there was back in 1998 when gas was around $0.97/gal and oil around $12/barrel. But worldwide demand only directly impacts oil prices, not pump prices - right?

Here's a link containing some crude oil price index historical data: http://www.wtrg.com/prices.htm

Thanks.

Michael J. Brown
Dearborn, Michigan
Michael,

Great question, and one that is going to take a lot more research on my part before I truly understand it.

But here’s the short version, which comes to me via a guy named John Kingston, the top oil analyst at Platt’s, a company that monitors energy markets:

Refiners don’t make much profit on gasoline. They almost look at it as a waste product in the refining process. They’d much rather refine oil into other higher-profit products, like diesel.

For the last two years global inventories of gasoline have been tight and global demand has been pretty robust and that sent gas prices soaring. But in the last few months a global economic slowdown has tempered demand. As a result, inventories of gasoline are a little higher than before, and prices have come down, though they haven’t come down as much as the price of oil has.

While the price of gasoline is related to the price of oil, it’s not a 1-to-1 relationship. It has more to do with inventory. If there is plenty of gasoline in inventory, gas prices can decline, even if the price of oil is going up. Conversely, if gasoline inventories are tight, prices can go up even if oil prices decline. That’s what we’re seeing right now due to Hurricane Ike. Inventory of gasoline is very tight because refineries have shut down, even though oil prices just dropped below $100 a barrel.

McElroy
Talk about ironic industrial hypocrisy, just look at the perfect example going on at Chrysler's Kenosha Engine Plant. The very same group of non UAW trades people (IAM-Machinists Union) that for decades have been serving the mechanical, hydraulic, machine maintenance, tool room machining needs for this major USA engine plant, are now working under a discontinuance contract facing total departure within 2-3 years maximum. Endless meetings with mind-boggling theory and tons of wasted paper have been in the past replaced with on the spot repair, rebuild, re engineer, etc. -------- talk about a story ---

Jeff Mohr
I cannot believe Tom LaSorda. What a fool! His answer to poor sales is marketing? More commercials? He is out of touch with reality. They need better products. Get to the top of the list in Consumer Reports. The Caliber is ugly. They lost the Van market to Toyota and Honda. Also, the venture capital company is going to gut the company and sell at first chance.

Tom needs a reality check.

Edward Spunkmeyer
Good morning Mr. John McElroy, my name is Paul Sapiano and I am Director of Business Development here at MGA Research.

I am a religious follower of your Sunday shows as well as your Automotive Updates on WWJ.

I was born in Detroit and have been a true automotive enthusiast all of my life which has led me into working in the automotive business which I love and will for the rest of my life as well.

One of my responsibilities here at MGA is to create new business opportunities and diversify such that we can offer new products and services for our customers.

One thing which is critical in business is reaction time, we must react and support customers as quickly as possible which is why I am sending this letter to you this morning.

While driving to work and listening to your automotive update about Jim Farley's comments needing 2 years to prepare for selling the new small vehicle really angered me as well as "stamped it official" why Ford is in trouble.

Jim Farley's comment about needing to educate the dealers with knowledge of Variable Timing and Technology really is unacceptable, especially needing 2 years to prepare.

Ford Motor Company needs to have these vehicles in the dealer show rooms ASAP and if necessary have Ford Engineers explain to customers the technology in these vehicles.

Please Mr. McElroy, what ever you can do to change this relaxed culture within Ford would be appreciated for all of us!

Thanks, keep up the good work.

Paul Sapiano
Director of Business Development
MGA Research Corporation
Troy, MI
John,

I love your show and these posts are great.

But, did you say "inexpensive EV?" That will be an oxymoron for a long time to come. Even longer if you believe Lithium will be supply constrained.

EVs will be the up market city cars. Think CL600-Type city cars, not Smarts.

GSP
John,

I read your article entitled “No Card Check” back in July 2007 in WARD”S AutoWorld. As the owner of a small contract manufacturing shop, this card check bill could be (and very well might be) devastating. The labor movement has just started a major push to get this bill pushed through early next year. I am writing to ask you to email or call your senators and congressman to oppose this legislation. They need to hear from people who know the devastating effects this bill will have! We can’t stand by and let them take away one of the most fundamental principles of our democracy. Please contact your senators and congressman and voice your opinion about this bill. It really matters and your voice counts! Thanks.

Zoi Romanchuk
PR Machine Works, Inc.
Let's not forget that Honda will be making a diesel Accord and Pilot either 2009 or 2010. It won't need Urea either! Too bad they dropped the ergonomics ball with the new interiors and went to these stupid butterfly/wafer/rocker switches from round knobs for the HVAC controls etc. I would have probably bought one when they come out except for the ergonomics. BTW, I do know ergonomics I'm and ex-military pilot and current major airline Captain.

Thanks,
Les Odgers
Let me start by congratulating you on a very interesting show. I like your show because it is different. I recently started to watch on the Internet, I used to watch on Speed, and I have viewed an older show on the truck of the year and my question is, why not the all new Subaru Forester?

Hugues Therien
Gatineau, Qc.
Hugues,

We’ll have more about the new Forester at the end of the year, when we do the complete wrap-up for the new models. At the time we shot the show you saw, none of us had driven the Forester.

McElroy
John,

Just received your note about the Autoline News Letter and I would love to be included. Again, I have watched your show for years now and it has been very informative. Being an automobile enthusiast, your shows have been insightful on how the auto industry really works.

Wishing you success in the future and in securing a new national channel to broadcast on. In the mean time, I will be watching your website

Best regards,
Bill
Just read an article in Boat U.S. magazine (Sept 2008) about the NOAA 41 foot research vessel going ‘really’ green by not using petroleum products. It runs twin 903 Cummins main engines on 100% soy bio-diesel fuel. The vessel uses canola lubricating oil in the engines and rapeseed oil to operate its deck crane, winches and other hydraulic equipment. I assume it won’t be long before we see related products at the local Murray’s auto discount stores.

James Placinski
I AIN'T GONNA DO IT.............I AIN'T RUNNIN' MY 800HP NASCAR CHEVY ON POND-SCUM!!!!!!

PETE LEWANDOWSKI
NORTHVILLE, MI
The North American Truck of the Year award may be important to the manufacturers but as an over 50 buyer it is becoming meaningless to me. On your recent segment on truck of the year possibilities the only vehicles you covered were station wagons, i.e. crossovers. Those vehicles are cars not trucks. I know the journalist group has resisted wanting to add a third category for crossovers but now, to many of us, you have a meaningless award. It does NOT reflect what I believe MOST people feel are trucks. There is a program on TV now called “Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader”. Take pictures of vehicles to firth graders and ask them which are trucks and which are cars.

Randy Richardson
La Habra, CA
Aw Randy,

I always knew I wasn’t as smart as a 5th grader!

JMc
John

Your show for this Sunday’s broadcast was very interesting regarding the activity in private equity. You always ask the right questions and I think the show would do well in national syndication. Have you ever looked into it?

For your information, Hertz was sold by Ford and bought by CD&R, Carlyle & Merrill Lynch Private Equity in 2005 for ~ net $4.4 billion of equity. The sponsors then a short time later extracted a $1 billion dividend from the deal...HTZ was acquired by Ford in 87, went public in 97 and then the o/s stock reacquired by Ford in 2001.

AutoNation is 44% owned by Lambert's ESL Partners, ESL ownership I believe has more than doubled in the last 12 months. Your guest from Dykema speculated more private equity deals could be done further down the chain with the retailers. There are already at least five publicly held companies that own auto retail assets and I wonder if the OEs want to see more consolidation with just a handful of large companies. State franchise laws may also get in the way...

Steven Gish, CFA
Caywood-Scholl Capital Management LLC
San Diego, CA
John,

Your most recent show with the Tom LaSorda interview was hard-hitting, in depth, and very informative. I especially liked your difficult questions and follow ups to LaSorda's answers, especially when he was spinning and glossing over what we know to be "the real” reality!!

Is there any prospect for you to be broadcasted on a regular TV channel again? I sincerely hope so. Until then, I plan on continuing to view your weekly show by podcast faithfully every week.

Keep up the great work!

Best regards,
Dave Kneer
John,

Great Tom LaSorda interview! Great questions! Of particular interest was your question, "It seems to me with the dollar as weak as it is and you guys having fixed assets that are not being used much, couldn't you export more out of the North American Region... more than you are doing now?" Tom's response was a listing of import duties and other exclusionary taxes that American car companies must pay to export American made autos into other countries.

Russia 25% import duty 70% luxury tax.
India 100% import duty tax.
China 25% import duty tax 20% excise tax.
Brazil 25% import duty tax.

These are but a few and I'm sure Tom could rattle off many more examples but it makes you wonder why in the world we have such one sided trade agreements when our manufacturing base in the Midwest is in a near depression. What are our government and corporate leaders thinking here? Is it hubris at the expense of the American worker? This outsourcing of American jobs has now driven the once mighty 'Big Three' to beg for a 50 billion dollar bailout in product development. How can we compete with these unfair un-American trade agreements?

Paul Wohlfarth
Ottawa Lake, MI
I just wanted to compliment you on a great show. Tom LaSorda was quite impressive. John had many good/tough questions, and Tom was generally very direct in his answers. Although the US auto industry is certainly struggling, I was impressed with the leadership/promise shown by Mr. LaSorda and I am hopeful that he can help Chrysler bring some highly competitive vehicles to the marketplace, especially in the area of economical, exciting, and safe cars (such as my VW GTI).

I am disappointed to not being able to find Autoline on Speed when I've looked for it recently. It was tough getting up at 7 am on Sunday mornings, but on top of that, it was very disappointing to not find your show. However, I'll try to frequently watch it via the web. Thank you.

Dennis Powers
Speedvision’s decision to drop Autoline Detroit is their loss. Your show is one of only two shows I regularly catch on Speedvision (SV). I've been an auto enthusiast for nearly 30 years and thoroughly enjoy your show.

I'm really glad I can catch it online. SV began as a great idea for auto enthusiasts, but has now morphed into something more like jiggle-vision, in what I assume is an attempt to capture the youth market.

Many shows on SV are so racy I would be embarrassed to watch them with my church pastor in the room. It's not about the vehicles anymore.

Thank you for continuing to produce informative and entertaining shows.

Robert V.
Navarre FL
John, like you, I'm an advocate of E85. It's readily available in the area where I live. However, GM seems to be producing fewer and fewer E85 cars. In fact, GM is down to only one car model, the Impala. Plus, it's almost impossible to get honest facts about the harm to a non-flex fuel car that will occur if a higher blend than E10 is used. Where I live, more and more stations are installing "blender pumps," where the consumer can choose E10, E30 or E85. I have a 2000 non-flex fuel car and I've been experimenting by self blending E85 and E10. I've blended as high as E40 without any codes being set by my car's computer and my car runs fine. Maybe I'm wrecking my engine, maybe not. I guess time will tell. However, as I see it, every less drop of oil from the Middle East that use is a good thing. Too bad politics is getting in the way of further reductions in our addition to crude.

Jim Schultz
Sioux Falls, SD
Jim,

When it comes to Flex-fuel vehicles from GM, there’s more than just the Impala. The Chevy HHR is available with a Flex-fuel 4-cylinder, and the Buick Lucerne has a Flex-fuel model, too.

In trucks, you can get Flex-fuel versions of the Silverado, Sierra, Avalanche, Suburban, Tahoe, Yukon, Savana and Express.

GM says that by 2012, 50% of its vehicles will be Flex-fuel.

Now, as far as blending higher than E10 in your non-flex-fuel car: DON’T DO IT! It’s not the engine that you’re going to damage. The alcohol in the fuel is going to eat the rubber gaskets and o-rings in your fuel pump and in the gas lines. It could also rust out part of the fuel system, unless it’s all stainless steel. That will not set off any engine codes.

McElroy
Roush Industries is converting an F-150 5.4L V8 to run on propane.

I have studied the alternatives and learned that propane fuel for internal combustion spark ignition engines is by far the greater value on several fronts.

With T. Boone Pickens touting natural gas because we have so much of it on-shore, the IRS giving substantial tax credits, because propane performs so nearly like gasoline that driver's can't tell the difference, because propane is easy on the environment, because the infrastructure for delivering propane to the consumer is so far advanced, because a satisfactory trip length can be carried on board, because there is the least sacrifice of load carrying capacity and because no other alternative fuel can make all these claims, I find it curious that there has been no journalistic recognition of these developments.

Jack Roush was in New York last Wednesday to promote his new enterprise, but I haven't found one word about it in any media. Perhaps you have some words of wisdom for me.

Stanley A. Wickman
Livonia, MI
A lot more people travel by car than airplane of late, despite the statement that driving over all is down. There are fewer planes now, fewer pilots, more lost time for travelers, more time delays, more changes of arrangements in travel, greater cost of luggage on board, food and drinks are more costly, etcetera, etc.

The less wealthy greater number of population, do not travel as much or as far as politicians who take tax money to pay the costs to anywhere at anytime, or the wealthy and powerful like those who have banks in Vanuatu. So, these lowly folk take a few more shorter trips to a lake, a race, a game, a school function, a family gathering, etcetera, etc.

So, devise a truck body with more light atop with pop-top or long linear windows high on sides from which one might be on a long comfortable couch which has TV and/or musical adjuncts, folds out for sleeping, under which storage for food, drinks, rods, reels, etc and suitcases atop which for short trips may be ideal. Having a few secretive locations for important items is a need as well. The accoutrement may be removable so as to be usable in a business or moving a family to a new home. I know that the panel vehicles exist, but skip the curving contours, make the frame stronger, somewhat wider with increased total inside volume and more durable off-road. Rear-end attachment on strong door for cycles, equipment for outdoor activities and other family supplies. Farther out would be the idea of a heavy duty platform for a Skidoo, or 4 wheeler or actual long floor with vehicle inside, numbers permitting.

Saving funds by sleeping in a vehicle rather than hotel or motel has its points and especially for woodsy outdoor excursions. It's usually a pain if you do not have arrangements solidified before a race or game and this would be a good all-round vehicle. And there is always the unanticipated adverse events to which this type of vehicle is a saving feature.

There is one other feature that I do not forget having worked in an ER, which influenced me to have an SUV, and that is a vehicle as described will be more likely to allow crash victims to survive. Drunks may abound around stadium events, hydroplaning with a light vehicle in rainstorms is rarely anticipated, and tough roads are not for the city rig. Volume sales will not be large because more people live in cities, but some will need the alternate advantages of something like this, as the country folk will appreciate.(What I can' compute is how you could have forward facing seats of one or more rows that will turn to allow connection lengthwise for a comfortable snooze.)
Hi John,

Had a chance to read your article on fuel prices in Ward's today and was most intrigued. Hope you don't mind a few personal comments:

I live in France where the cost of fuel is about €1.38-€1.48 these days. To fill my VW Tiguan tank of diesel today, I am up around €75 per tank, which lasts almost 1.5 weeks (MAYBE on a good week). France has always been close to double the price of gas as the States, which always resulted in people only taking the car for most important trips. Hence, a fantastic transport infrastructure. Also having been based in Holland the last 3 years, where cost of fuel is similar to France, they ride their bikes as much as possible, which results in more fuel economy and.... better physical health at the same time:)

It makes me wonder what happens when the cost of fuel is too high for people?

Here in France, the average salary, we call it the SMIC, is 1 321,02 Euros a month brut (and that includes executives, not just entry level jobs and unskilled workers). With 100-300Euros a month dedicated to driving a car, another 600Euros to a small 1 bedroom apartment, what is left?? I would hate to see the same thing happen in the US, although I would love to see smaller more fuel-efficient cars.

Just a thought, but is it not better to encourage more fuel efficient vehicles in a different way? I am not going to tell you the virtues of thermoplastics (although I can ::))) or different powertrains or anything else, but I just get worried when I read about more expensive fuel. There must be other ways to encourage the production and the sale of more fuel efficient vehicles, no?

With all respect, John, hope you will keep those thoughts in mind.

Best regards to you, Jim and the team,

Anne Clement
John,

I happened to glance over on a co-workers workbench and read this article headline, "Keep Fuel Prices High". Working in the emission controls industry, I found this outrageous. I gave your article it's just due and read it entirely but wanted to point out some critical errors.

1. Due to keeping gas prices high 75% of my co-workers have been out of work for 3 months, since one of our primary product lines that we just bought millions of dollars worth of machinery for is the F150 and no one is buying them due to high prices. If we just spent millions to re-tool, where do we get the capital to re-tool again for these high efficiency cars?

2. If 75% of the people are currently unemployed, who is going to be purchasing these overpriced vehicles at the 2012ish time line you suggest?

3. If fuel prices stay high, so does everything else, i.e. groceries, utilities. Who can afford a new overpriced vehicle just to save a few bucks at the pump?

4. My vehicles as well as many others are paid for, why would I want to take on a $400 plus a month payment, plus high insurance rates on a new vehicle to save a couple bucks at the pump?

5. High gas prices aren't inspiring people to buy new high efficiency cars where I live. Instead, they are bicycling or buying Chinese scooters and sending even more money outside of the U.S.

6. Even if gas prices were to go down, most of us in the middle class could not afford a new vehicle and any new high efficiency vehicle would have to be at least 10 years old and used before we could afford to purchase one and receive the benefits.

Lower fuel prices and everything can go down and Americans can go back to work and be able to afford a new vehicle some day. The only thing I can say is step into the middle class auto workers shoes for a year and see what you say then.

Sincerely,
Bill K.
Bill,

When fuel prices go down and we go back to our profligate ways OPEC is going to control us more than ever before and leave us open to a bigger disaster in the future. Why keep a gun pointed at America’s head?

McElroy
Good show as usual, John.

I agree with both Natalie and Mark. The list of upcoming cars for 2009 doesn't really grab me either. However, there is one entrant that you never mentioned that I think is worthy of praise. The Honda Accord diesel. I am by no means a Honda fan. In fact, I'm still thinking about talking to a lawyer to have my older brother removed from the family for buying a Honda Stream. LOL. Just kidding. The world is under a spell cast by the engineers at Honda and I think that if Honda pulls this off, this will be our ticket out of the OPEC age. But seriously, I believe that this will be the car to prove to the American public that diesels are workable. Now, the old notion that the increase in diesel use will only push up the price is somewhat true. But like you, I don't think the price of oil should come down. I believe we should be moving towards replacing petroleum altogether. This is why bio-diesel makes so much sense. It is far easier and cheaper to manufacture bio-diesel than ethanol, hydrogen, or to manufacture meaningful batteries to power hybrids or full electric cars. And I'm not talking about using corn here. I'm talking about using crops that most Americans (in this instant) do not generally associate with food. Algae, palm, castor, jatropha, honge and copaiba oils come immediately to mind. Let's hope that Honda markets the cars properly and the public keeps their eyes and minds open.

Thanks again, keep up the great work.

Richard Tait,
Kingston, Jamaica
Sorry to have lost you on Speed Channel but it's their loss.

Are you aware of the grass roots H H O gas phenomenon that's quietly spreading across the country? I know at least 3 tinkerers that are using these generators on their cars to improve fuel mileage by as much as 40% real world. I know hydrogen works as a fuel, but changing the entire infrastructure is a huge undertaking. Taking water and creating hydrogen in the car is so much simpler and cost efficient.

Right now it's a garage technology. Are the manufacturers aware of it? I can't believe they aren't. Of course, no one really can make money from this idea- sell less gas- use water as a partial fuel source to really stretch fuel mileage- every thing the Gas companies don't want. If the auto industry is researching this technology, think of the efficiency their engineering departments could produce.

It's not a fairy tale- the technology is there, now, in a primitive state, and it works! Check it out. If you haven't, Google Brown's gas, H H O, Water 4 Gas, etc.

The Wright brothers didn't take no for an answer-

Mitch Packer
BMW Service Advisor
Coral Springs, FL
Hi John,

I don't see why Speed took your show off. I wouldn't walk across the street to watch NASCAR. Speed has some really dumb shows on, like Destain, and the other ones from Southern CA. All they know how to do is cuss each other and talk stupid. I have been watching your show for many years. I enjoy you on the internet, I don't have to worry about being interrupted on Sunday mornings by NASCAR.
John,

Please address the biggest automotive issue, how will road taxes be paid if the country switches to plug in electric vehicles?

There is much more involved than the general public thinks because the government can not possibly give up the road tax when gas and diesel fueled vehicles are replaced by plug in electric vehicles.

Seriously there is no way that the government can give up the money that is currently paid every time I fuel my vehicles. If I get my fuel from the power grid, there is currently no system in place for me to pay my fuel tax. I know the government is not able to give up this source of income and I am unwilling to stop paying it because I demand to drive on roads that are smooth and in good repair.

There are many ways that the road taxes could be paid, however the public is very resistant to change and therein lies the problem. Is the government addressing this monumental challenge or is the government going to wait to address it until there is a significant number of plug in electric vehicles on the road? Is the government discouraging plug in electric vehicles so they don’t have to address the road tax issue?

Please bring this issue out into the open; the collection of road tax may be the biggest stumbling block to the development of plug in electric vehicles.

John, please address this issue!

Conway Wells
Conway,

You raise a great issue. This is going to become a hot topic of debate over the next decade.

Most motorists hate gas taxes, but as you point out, that’s what paves our roads and builds our bridges. Most of the interstate system is now over half a century old. To keep our roads in top condition, those taxes should probably be raised right now.

But as people drive less, and buy less gas, those tax revenues are falling.

Some states are considering going to a per-mile tax, rather than a gas tax. But how do you measure how many miles a car has traveled, and do it fairly and make it easy to monitor?

This is not going to be an easy fix. In Michigan for example, Governor Jennifer Granholm has already said she won’t tolerate higher gas taxes or toll roads, even though our roads are in desperate need of better repair and maintenance. Where’s the money going to come from?

As the situation gets more desperate, we’ll start to hear a lot more debate about this issue.

McElroy
John,

As I finished watching another great show online, some thoughts came to me: while the price of gas has been rising, automakers have been making their vehicles bigger and of course thirstier. Take for example, all the smaller pickups, without exception, have grown to midsize, with bigger engines for lower fuel economy, even cars that could do with a smaller 4 have to have a larger 4 or a 6 to get adequate power for their larger and heavier bodies. I long for a small 4 cylinder pickup like in the old days, or a diesel VW that could get 40mpg without all the mechanical complexity, which by the way is pricing many families out of a new car, and forcing them to buy used. One more note: the Yaris hatchback, which has been put down by the auto media, is flying off the dealer lots. Why? It’s cheap to buy, maintain, and even has the best resale market. Also, the few owners I have spoken to love the thing, it reminds me of the old Beetle.
John

First, let me say that I enjoy the internet version of your show although I am one of many who surely want your show to be broadcast once again on TV as well. Also, I want to say that I've only recently discovered "John's Journal" and love it too, for its wide-ranging and interesting set of topics. But, the reason I'm writing at the moment is to mention that its altogether very obvious that the 2009 model cars are going to show the long lead-times it takes to ramp-up to what seems to be ever-changing public whims about what cars people want to buy.

Take, for instance, cars such as the Cadillac CTS, the Acura TL and Acura RL as well as the Pontiac G-8 as examples of cars that that are spectacular in many ways but surely show their age as old-school designs in the current era of such high gas prices.

But, to counterbalance that last statement I've made now we see that petroleum is selling for something akin to a 20% discount compared to what we saw only 2-3 weeks ago in July. So, if this price stabilizes or reduces even further, far too many American-market car buyers will feel that it’s okay to go back to buying luxurious, gas-guzzling cars once again. Then, that 3-4% reduced fuel consumption we've had recently as compared to a year ago will quickly disappear once again, causing the market for petroleum to rise to ever-higher levels most likely. So, what's the auto industry to do in view of fickle oil prices and even more fickle buyers who seem to shift their buying mood so easily and so quickly? I guess what I'm trying to say in summary is that I agree with your viewpoint that we need to think of any reduction in gas prices as temporary.

Perhaps we need to have some kind of sliding-scale tax imposed that would keep gas prices in a more narrowly-focused range, more tax when the oil prices are lower and less tax when crude oil prices are higher.

That would give the auto industry some kind of more definite direction about how to design and market new cars, give potential buyers the idea that gas prices are more predictable. Also, it would give the government some added incentive to do what's necessary to stabilize or reduce gasoline prices in order to improve their gas-tax revenue stream. What say you regarding the advantages and disadvantages of a sliding-scale gasoline tax?

Jim Gordon
John,

When I heard about GM's Volt, it appeared as if the company had finally hit on the right hybrid format: a plug-in electric car with a small onboard gasoline engine for charging the battery instead of powering the car. I even bought shares of the company based on their realization that this was, perceivably, the most promising technology for passenger cars in the near term. I had to reassure my wife of this as the share price immediately dropped two-thirds in value.

Now that I learn more about the car as it nears production, my worst fears are being realized. Rather than design the battery pack to be easily and cheaply recycled after, say, six months to a year of service, they are shooting for ten year battery life. They have also designed the battery pack as a major structural element in the car, an indication that it cannot be easily removed and replaced. This is so wrong it's criminal. GM could have captured meaningful income on those recycling battery sales, even at reasonable prices, and not have worried so much about leaping the developmental hurdle of coming up with a ten-year battery. Besides, as someone who keeps his vehicle more than ten years, the prospect of a looming bill for a major component of my car is much scarier than a milder expense once or twice a year. Then there's the prospect of having to replace a defective battery (it's new tech, it will happen) early in the car's life. Creating the easily replaceable, fully recyclable, shorter-life battery pack would have been so much smarter and more profitable.

Why is the mammoth corporation so dumb?

Steve Leyton
Palmdale, CA
Steve,

Several thoughts.

Lithium-ion batteries are horrifically expensive. In the Volt, the first generation battery pack will cost $10,000. It has to be designed for long life, so that the cost can be amortized over a long period of time. It’s unrealistic to think that those batteries can be pulled out after 6 to 12 months and recycled cheaply. I promise you no automaker will achieve that in the first generation (or second, or third).

You may be right that there will be problems with the early batteries, but that certainly hasn’t been the case with nickel-metal hydride batteries in hybrids. In fact, they’ve surprised just about everyone with how long they’re lasting. Automakers will take the same care to have the same thing happen with li-on.

Just because the battery pack is a structural member, don’t think that you can’t unbolt it and remove the batteries. It won’t be that difficult.

Also, next time don’t buy the stock in any car company based on the promise of a future model, no matter how promising it sounds. First check out the economic fundamentals of an automaker before taking the plunge. Having said that, I hope GM stock soars in the future and makes you filthy rich!

McElroy
It is almost criminal that you guys are no longer on the Speed channel and I can not get broad band internet out in the country! Best Wishes.

Robert Johns
M'boro, TN
With all the big SUVs not sold, any word on a company to convert these to electric power with air cond, cruise, and all the options? I saw hybrid technologies does this. Ever heard of them? Go on www.hybridtechnologies.com. See what you think.

Tim G
Orion, Mich
John,

I have to say Mark Phelan nailed it in his assessment of Acura. I don't want to paint with a broad brush, but it had to be ADHD-addled marketers who made the dumb decision to drop 'names' in favor of alphanumeric designations. (Maybe the same dummies moved over to Lincoln and promptly proceeded to wreck that brand with still more alphanumerics.)

Not only did they do away with memorable names, they proceeded to create a scheme where there's no logic or structure. For example, if you talk BMW, there's a logical procession: 1, 3, 5, 7, etc. At Acura, pop quiz: which is the higher model? TL or TSX. MDX or RDX? Only a Honda fanboy would know the difference immediately; everyone else would have to think about it? (To be honest, Mercedes-Benz is now just as bad.)

As for the new TSX, clearly someone was asleep at the wheel. Not only is it 'just' a European Accord with an incredibly ugly nose, it's actually a step backward. Aside from a few new gadgets there are no real, serious or substantial improvements over the old TSX. Plus, it's slightly larger and heavier, yet the powertrain is unchanged. At least, Acura could have plugged in the turbo four from the RDX, but noooo.

I just don't get Honda's thinking --or lack thereof-- as far as Acura goes. Do they want to compete with Lexus and Infiniti? Do they want to get buyers to consider their cars instead of BMW's or Audi's? If the answer to either question is "Yes", it certainly doesn't show in the product.

Honda's Formula One team is struggling big-time. Acura is struggling as well. Honda's design studios are being led by blind men (have you seen the new Pilot?). The new Accord is awkward to look at as well. Honda didn't manage their hybrid program well, leaving them to suffer in the shadow of the Prius. In sum, I truly believe there's some degree of leadership vacuum within the Honda Motor Company. They may not have jumped the shark but --Fits and Civics aside-- this is not looking good.

Just my four cents (inflation, you know).

James
John,

After watching your show for a few years now, I'm starting to notice a theme.... Natalie Neff really knows her stuff!!! Her point on the Japanese placing a lot of importance on "model name equity" is well put and is one of the areas that the domestics have missed the mark.

As for Saturn's troubles? Saturn does have a great portfolio, and fairly well organized too. Once again, the Japanese have taken decades to gradually improve their brands, model change after model change the public became more aware. Saturn is trying to do it all in about 2 years, and the awareness takes time. On the other hand, in this age of information being at our fingertips, the public should bear a bit of the blame for not recognizing a great product.

Two more things... Your assessment of the new Corolla is very accurate. I am an enthusiast, but when it came time to part with my money, I bought a Corolla. Sometimes we forget that a majority of the buying public are not enthusiasts and this might just be the perfect car for them. Lastly, why no mention of the IS-F from Lexus? I wouldn't consider it a winner for Car of the Year, but this is a big leap for Lexus and definitely worth mentioning.

Thanks,
James
Hi John,

As an autoworker in Canada there has been little said about the large fleet car [police cars, limo's, dso] sales of the Big Three. The effect of high fuel cost to cities to run their fleets, and possible changes that city governments may make to their way of running things [more fuel efficient units, etc.] There must be many cities that have spent their fuel budget already. This might make an interesting show?

I enjoy your show, never miss it.

Edward Roberts
Funny how you comment on the G8's V8 having bad gas mileage but not the Hyundays V8 near luxery sedan. Why not check the numbers, I'll bet you the G8 gets better mileage! The G8 had the LS series motor and has the best SFC of any V8 out there w/o the idiotic complications dual overhead cams with timing belts that need replacing or of hybrids and their batteries that will need to be replaced. You need to start finding out how much those battery packs will cost because I was told they are usually done after about 80,000 miles.You need to factor that in when you do comparasons, especially vs Diesels.

BTW Toyoya's has had more recalls than GM this last year. Stop buying off the great quality of Toyota or Honda, that's old drivel. I had more trouble with my CRX than I have with my Buick given the same age, as my brother did with his MR2. The thing that Toy and Honda do better is select good suppliers for thier accessories, like turn signal switches, etc. Toyotas quality peaked in the 70's and Honda's in the 80's relative to GM. Lets not forget the garbage we get from the EU with BMW's average brake job costing $1300 for the front end only! Or I-6 cracked blocks. Lets not forget who pays the most in CAFE standard violations, I believe your show said it was the Europeans!

Note, I'm NOT a GM employee, I'm a airline captain that's tired of the nonsense about quality.

Thanks,
Les Odgers

P.S. If you have any influence with Honda, tell them to switch bach to dials vs push buttons and switches for HVC controls, the ergonomis is far better for dials. If you want, call me and I'll explain, I've dealt with ergonomics as a life-and-death issue all my professional career, and you cars guys are asslep in comparason. I won't buy a new honda because of that reason. Read about the F-16's original side stick and HUD for more ergonomic info..
Hi John,

Too bad about SPEED. Years ago my DVR recorded Autoline vs. the scheduled (then postponed) auto race and I've been hooked ever since. We now live in the IPOD (Podcast) era. I would hope you would start a video podcast of Autoline as a 'Special Edition' when it is called for. Two, Three, Four talking heads in a studio is fine as audio, when you are in LA at a "Flea Market' then video.

Please, please do a Podcast of John's Journal. Skype it when you are on the road. Please do not make the same mistake most podcasters make. DO NOT BE TOO LONG! My two favorite Auto Postcasts are 'Carcast' from the Wall Street Journal, and "Car Tech' from CNET. Both mostly are short and to the point. You have the advantage over both of these podcasts because not that the hosts are bad, but for the most part, they are 'fanboys' and you are an Automotive Journalist. I've tried to listen to Autoblog's Podcast but it is WAY TOO LONG and rambles. Too bad, it's a very interesting blog.

Larry
I am so upset with Speed TV for dropping Autoline, I am dropping Speed TV after 6 years. Will you start doing POD casts?

Bryan
Bryan,

Actually we do offer podcasts of every show as well as Autoline EXTRA. They're free of charge and a convenient way to receive Autoline each week. You can find all the info you need about subscription options here: http://www.autolinedetroit.tv/autoline/podcast.php

McElroy
I just wanted to say to John McElroy: that video episode with the Ghosn interview was great! Very interesting and informative. I normally don't waste my time with the videos when I can just read things at my own pace, but I'm glad I watched it.
Your comments are very interesting, where do you get your information from?

Butch Tyrpin
Butch,

I always cite my sources whenever I use information that I got from interviews, research or other publications. Otherwise, it’s stuff that comes out of my head!

McElroy
Dear John,

With four-cylinder engines that are fuel-efficient being all the rage and no one able to get one out before 2010 or 2011, why is there an entire plant sitting idle in Dundee, Michigan? This plant has won the Harbour award, the Shingo award and also the top plant award. And the plant is already tooled up and ready to crank out engines such as 1.4 L twin chargers. It’s kind of like being the prettiest girl at the dance and no one's asking you to dance. What are your thoughts on this?

Thanks,
Jeff
Jeff,

You’re right, the Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance (GEMA) has two engine plants, each capable of making 400,000 engines a year, and one of them is sitting empty. GEMA is an alliance between Chrysler, Mitsubishi and Hyundai. As you know, Chrysler is having problems selling its 4-cylinder cars and Jeeps, Mitsubishi’s sales are in a complete tailspin, and Hyundai, for whatever reason has never taken any engines from that plant.

As a result, Chrysler is out shopping the empty engine plant to any manufacturer that wants to use it.

But you know what the lead times in this industry are. Even if some car company signed a deal this afternoon to start using that plant, it would take a couple of years before it would make its first engine.

There is a shortage of 4-cylinder engine capacity in the U.S. market right now, due to high gas prices. But will those prices stay where they are? Will they shoot up higher? Will they drop a lot more? No one knows, and due to that uncertainty most automakers are sitting on their hands to see what happens.

Even so, it’s likely someone will use at least part of that plant.

McElroy
Dear John,

I read your Commentary on "Show Me the 21st Century," Wards, July. First, I fully agree with your premise and know that exploration is rampant, though largely underground, at least in GM. I retired last year from GM R&D.

We have long been a Member of the MIT Media Lab. Several years ago, MIT brought us into a program with Bill Mitchell, Head of Architecture and the Media Lab, and Frank Geary. The idea was for Frank's studio to produce a fresh design. The agendas were mixed and the program never gelled, though it survives in a different form. Frank wanted to try his then-cutting-edge "CADCAM" (design a building on the tube and port to manufacturing) for cars. Bill wanted a car design to mesh with his real agenda, redoing the urban landscape. GM hoped for a head-turning show car.

Cost to build a Concept was high so time went by at GM's end (enter - our financial problems). We did have GM designers working with MIT's student design team (under Mitchell) and interacting in California with Geary. But Frank got busy with commissions. And Bill eventually morphed the MIT project into the present City Car, which you can find on their website.

Wayne Cherry was point for GM at the time, both as our Design Head, then program liaison to MIT and the Geary Studio in retirement. He would know the story and any follow-on.

You caught my interest with a futuristic option that once flickered in my GM world.

Sincerely,
Dexter Snyder
Birmingham, MI
I am THRILLED THRILLED THRILLED that you guys decided to offer the program Autoline to internet viewers before the actual PBS screening. I WOULD HAVE BEEN THRILLED IF IT WAS MADE AVAILABLE THE SAME DAY, so this is even better.

I am the guy who wrote you a couple of years ago bemoaning the fact that twice a year I was DEPRIVED of your quality show for two weeks or more, a show I value so much that I buy the extra cable package, and that gets me up Sunday morning here to settle in with my coffee and PUT MY EAR TO THE GROUND TO HEAR WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE INDUSTRY. Yours is the ONLY automotive show that I don't miss-----------all the rest are either not relevant to me, or too narrow in focus. Sure I could get some video highlights, but not the whole show.

** NOW I don't have to miss your program any more, for PBS CAMPAIGNS!

** NOW I can go to church at my preferred time --the early mass--- and not wrestle with unreliable video-taping that has disappointed me many times, or go to a later mass and miss seeing my friends.

You have made a big difference to me, and I appreciate it very much.

AUTOLINE is now AVAILABLE ON DEMAND! Woo hoo! Congratulations and THANK YOU!

John Henker
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Sorry to learn that your relationship with SpeedTV is ending. I have watched Autoline Detroit regularly since I first discovered it. I've met John on numerous occasions at various auto shows, and have always told him how much I gain from the show and how much I enjoy it.

I'll be sure to catch it on the 'net. Please let John know how much his show is appreciated!

Bobb Rayner
Auto Show presenter/product specialist
Lincoln-Mercury
Deptford, NJ
John,

I am now twelve years retired but in the early seventies I worked at the National HQ of Datsun/Nissan in engineering, doing air pollution testing of both vehicles right off the ship and tested vehicles on their way to accruing 50K miles as Federal and California laws required. I had also worked previously at Chrysler Motors doing essentially the same work at their test facility in Santa Fe Springs.

At least at the time I worked there and I am quite certain later, Nissan didn't own one stick of furniture or anything else they used. Every last item was leased, from test equipment to the brand new building that was completed in 1972. They owned nothing that would have to be moved. That approach did provide difficulties when they were refusing to buy government mandated new and more accurate instrumentation that state and federal law was demanding for lowered emissions. I would be most interested to find out whether or not they employ the same practice in their new home? I expect that all they had to move was data records in very portable form. Their Corporate building was actually located in Carson just south of Los Angeles near the harbor where their vehicles came off the boat on Terminal Island.

I must add that working there was a great experience that I gave up to return to building and testing spacecraft from two Mars missions, to my last eighteen years in Space Shuttle engineering. Yet I wonder if this unwillingness to commit capital contributed to their difficulties after I left.

Mr. Katayama who brought Datsun/Nissan to the United States was a most personable leader who was always concerned about his people and if you had told him something about your family he would remember it months later!

Special regards,
Ed Roos

Send us your thoughts: viewermail@autolinedetroit.tv